2000 Citroen Xsara vs. 2013 Lexus RX
To start off, 2013 Lexus RX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,868 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Lexus RX (291 HP) has 221 more horse power than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lexus RX weights approximately 940 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lexus RX (317 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen Xsara. (128 Nm). This means 2013 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen Xsara | 2013 Lexus RX | |
| Make | Citroen | Lexus |
| Model | Xsara | RX |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1868 cc | 211 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 291 HP |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 317 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.2 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1885 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1695 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2740 mm |
