2000 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 1966 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 894 kg more than 1966 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Arcadia | 1966 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Daewoo | Lotus |
Model | Arcadia | Elan |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3206 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 696 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3700 mm |