2000 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 1973 Matra-Simca M670
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Matra-Simca M670. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Matra-Simca M670 would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 (445 HP @ 11000 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Matra-Simca M670 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 910 kg more than 1973 Matra-Simca M670.
Because 1973 Matra-Simca M670 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Matra-Simca M670. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Arcadia | 1973 Matra-Simca M670 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Arcadia | M670 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1973 |
| Engine Size | 3206 cc | 2999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 445 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 11000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4010 mm |
