2000 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 2011 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2011 Fiat Croma is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2011 Fiat Croma. (197 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 2011 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fiat Croma weights approximately 135 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Arcadia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Fiat Croma has automatic transmission and 2000 Daewoo Arcadia has manual transmission. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Fiat Croma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Arcadia | 2011 Fiat Croma | |
Make | Daewoo | Fiat |
Model | Arcadia | Croma |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3206 cc | 2387 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1725 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4790 mm |