2000 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 2012 Suzuki Equator
To start off, 2012 Suzuki Equator is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,953 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Suzuki Equator is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Suzuki Equator (261 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 295 kg more than 2012 Suzuki Equator.
Because 2012 Suzuki Equator is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Daewoo Arcadia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Suzuki Equator will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Suzuki Equator has automatic transmission and 2000 Daewoo Arcadia has manual transmission. 2000 Daewoo Arcadia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Suzuki Equator will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Arcadia | 2012 Suzuki Equator | |
| Make | Daewoo | Suzuki |
| Model | Arcadia | Equator |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3206 cc | 3953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5600 mm |
