2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1956 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,348 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Lanos | 1956 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Lanos | 12 M |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1348 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2500 mm |