2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,348 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus Elite (83 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus Elite should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 430 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite.
Because 1963 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Lanos | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Daewoo | Lotus |
Model | Lanos | Elite |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1348 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 29 L |