2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,348 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 435 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (115 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Daewoo Lanos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Lanos | 1963 Seat 600 | |
Make | Daewoo | Seat |
Model | Lanos | 600 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1348 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2010 mm |