2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1977 Renault 14
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Renault 14. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Renault 14 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1977 Renault 14. (57 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1977 Renault 14. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 170 kg more than 1977 Renault 14. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (145 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Renault 14. (93 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Lanos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Renault 14.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Lanos | 1977 Renault 14 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Renault |
| Model | Lanos | 14 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1218 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 57 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 48 L |
