2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1978 Daihatsu Taft
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1978 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1978 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 15 kg more than 1978 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (145 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Lanos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Lanos | 1978 Daihatsu Taft | |
Make | Daewoo | Daihatsu |
Model | Lanos | Taft |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 63 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2030 mm |