2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Jeep CJ7 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Lanos.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Jeep CJ7 (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. (115 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1982 Jeep CJ7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Lanos | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Daewoo | Jeep |
Model | Lanos | CJ7 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1348 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1305 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2380 mm |