2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1986 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1986 Dodge Charger. (62 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1986 Dodge Charger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Charger weights approximately 15 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Lanos.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (145 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Dodge Charger. (117 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Lanos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Lanos | 1986 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Daewoo | Dodge |
| Model | Lanos | Charger |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 117 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2460 mm |
