2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2005 Daihatsu Terios
To start off, 2005 Daihatsu Terios is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2005 Daihatsu Terios. (86 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 2005 Daihatsu Terios. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daihatsu Terios weights approximately 90 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Lanos.
Because 2005 Daihatsu Terios is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daihatsu Terios will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (145 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Daihatsu Terios. (120 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Lanos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Daihatsu Terios.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Lanos | 2005 Daihatsu Terios | |
Make | Daewoo | Daihatsu |
Model | Lanos | Terios |
Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 120 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 46 L |