2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2005 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2005 Fiat Stilo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. Both 2000 Daewoo Lanos and 2005 Fiat Stilo are equipped with a 1,596 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Lanos (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2005 Fiat Stilo. (99 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 2005 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 231 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Lanos.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 145 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Lanos | 2005 Fiat Stilo | |
| Make | Daewoo | Fiat |
| Model | Lanos | Stilo |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 58 L |
