2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2006 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2006 GMC Sierra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Sierra (195 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. (105 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Sierra should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Lanos.
Because 2006 GMC Sierra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 GMC Sierra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Sierra (354 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. (145 Nm). This means 2006 GMC Sierra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Lanos | 2006 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Daewoo | GMC |
Model | Lanos | Sierra |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 354 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 5850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3650 mm |