2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2006 Rover 75

To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 182 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Lanos.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. (115 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. 2006 Rover 75 has automatic transmission and 2000 Daewoo Lanos has manual transmission. 2000 Daewoo Lanos will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Rover 75 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Daewoo Lanos 2006 Rover 75
Make Daewoo Rover
Model Lanos 75
Year Released 2000 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1348 cc 4601 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 74 HP 256 HP
Torque 115 Nm 245 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 76.5 mm 90.2 mm
Engine Stroke Size 73.4 mm 90 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4250 mm 4750 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 48 L 65 L