2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Lanos.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. (115 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2000 Daewoo Lanos has manual transmission. 2000 Daewoo Lanos will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Lanos | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Daewoo | Holden |
Model | Lanos | Epica |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1348 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2700 mm |