2000 Daewoo Lanos vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C30 weights approximately 422 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo C30 (320 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Lanos. (145 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Lanos | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Daewoo | Volvo |
Model | Lanos | C30 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1457 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2640 mm |