2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1946 Simca 5
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Simca 5 would be higher. At 796 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Matiz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1946 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1946 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Matiz weights approximately 280 kg more than 1946 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1946 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1946 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1946 Simca 5 | |
Make | Daewoo | Simca |
Model | Matiz | 5 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1946 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 570 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 14 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 3220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2010 mm |