2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1955 DKW F 93
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW F 93. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW F 93 would be higher. At 896 cc (3 cylinders), 1955 DKW F 93 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1955 DKW F 93. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1955 DKW F 93. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 DKW F 93 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Matiz (73 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1955 DKW F 93. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Daewoo Matiz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1955 DKW F 93.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1955 DKW F 93 | |
| Make | Daewoo | DKW |
| Model | Matiz | F 93 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 73 Nm | 71 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2360 mm |
