2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1963 DAF 600
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 796 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Matiz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Matiz weights approximately 210 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Matiz (73 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Matiz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1963 DAF 600 | |
| Make | Daewoo | DAF |
| Model | Matiz | 600 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 19 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 73 Nm | 45 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 630 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2060 mm |
