2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1964 Wartburg 311
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Wartburg 311. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Wartburg 311 would be higher. At 992 cc (3 cylinders), 1964 Wartburg 311 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1964 Wartburg 311. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1964 Wartburg 311. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Wartburg 311 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Wartburg 311 (98 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (73 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 Wartburg 311 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1964 Wartburg 311 | |
Make | Daewoo | Wartburg |
Model | Matiz | 311 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1964 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 73 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2460 mm |