2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1965 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1965 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 270 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1965 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Daewoo | DKW |
| Model | Matiz | Munga |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2010 mm |
