2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Volvo 220 (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Volvo 220 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Volvo 220 weights approximately 175 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (73 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1965 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Daewoo | Volvo |
Model | Matiz | 220 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2610 mm |