2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1966 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 1,183 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Ford Taunus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1966 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1966 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Taunus weights approximately 5 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1966 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1966 Ford Taunus | |
| Make | Daewoo | Ford |
| Model | Matiz | Taunus |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1183 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 845 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2530 mm |
