2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1966 Peugeot 404
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Peugeot 404. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Peugeot 404 would be higher. At 1,468 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Peugeot 404 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Peugeot 404 (55 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Peugeot 404 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Peugeot 404 weights approximately 276 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Peugeot 404 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Peugeot 404. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1966 Peugeot 404 | |
Make | Daewoo | Peugeot |
Model | Matiz | 404 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1468 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2850 mm |