2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1966 Wartburg 353
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Wartburg 353. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Wartburg 353 would be higher. At 991 cc (3 cylinders), 1966 Wartburg 353 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1966 Wartburg 353. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1966 Wartburg 353. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Wartburg 353 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Wartburg 353 (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (73 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1966 Wartburg 353 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1966 Wartburg 353 | |
Make | Daewoo | Wartburg |
Model | Matiz | 353 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 73 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2460 mm |