2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1967 DAF 44
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 DAF 44 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1967 DAF 44. (43 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Matiz weights approximately 55 kg more than 1967 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 DAF 44 (80 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (73 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1967 DAF 44 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1967 DAF 44 | |
| Make | Daewoo | DAF |
| Model | Matiz | 44 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 73 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2260 mm |
