2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 102 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (73 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Matiz | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2210 mm |