2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1972 Plymouth Road Runner
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Plymouth Road Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Plymouth Road Runner would be higher. At 5,563 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Plymouth Road Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Plymouth Road Runner weights approximately 760 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1972 Plymouth Road Runner is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Plymouth Road Runner. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1972 Plymouth Road Runner | |
| Make | Daewoo | Plymouth |
| Model | Matiz | Road Runner |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 5563 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2980 mm |
