2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe would be higher. At 2,616 cc (2 cylinders), 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe weights approximately 270 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (73 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Matiz | RX 4 Coupe |
Year Released | 2000 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2520 mm |