2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1980 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mercedes-Benz E. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mercedes-Benz E would be higher. At 1,988 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 500 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1980 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1980 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Daewoo | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Matiz | E |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2800 mm |
