2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1982 Lada S
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada S would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Lada S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Lada S weights approximately 160 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1982 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1982 Lada S | |
Make | Daewoo | Lada |
Model | Matiz | S |
Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2470 mm |