2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1990 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 780 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1990 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1990 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Matiz | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2880 mm |