2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1996 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 222 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 374 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (73 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Matiz | 1996 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Daewoo | Dodge |
Model | Matiz | Ram |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 73 Nm | 447 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3530 mm |