2000 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 500 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Matiz. (73 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Matiz | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Daewoo | Mini |
Model | Matiz | Countryman |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 73 Nm | 155 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2595 mm |