2000 Daewoo Musiro vs. 1952 Ford Crestline
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Musiro is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Musiro. (105 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Musiro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Ford Crestline weights approximately 445 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Musiro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Musiro | 1952 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Musiro | Crestline |
Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 3929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2940 mm |