2000 Daewoo Musiro vs. 1956 Rover P4
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Musiro is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Musiro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Musiro (105 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1956 Rover P4. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Musiro should accelerate faster than 1956 Rover P4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Rover P4 weights approximately 345 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Musiro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Musiro (145 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Rover P4. (138 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Musiro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Musiro | 1956 Rover P4 | |
Make | Daewoo | Rover |
Model | Musiro | P4 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 138 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2830 mm |