2000 Daewoo Musiro vs. 1968 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Musiro is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Musiro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Musiro (105 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Musiro should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 165 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Musiro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (163 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Musiro. (145 Nm). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Musiro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Musiro | 1968 Holden Belmont | |
| Make | Daewoo | Holden |
| Model | Musiro | Belmont |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2130 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2830 mm |
