2000 Daewoo Musiro vs. 1998 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Musiro is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Musiro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Musiro (105 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Musiro should accelerate faster than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 3 kg more than 2000 Daewoo Musiro.
Because 2000 Daewoo Musiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Daewoo Musiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Musiro (145 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm). This means 2000 Daewoo Musiro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Musiro | 1998 Seat Inca Kombi | |
| Make | Daewoo | Seat |
| Model | Musiro | Inca Kombi |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1391 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1038 kg |
