2000 Daewoo Musiro vs. 2012 Ford F-350
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Musiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Musiro would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 280 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Musiro. (105 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Musiro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-350 (548 Nm) has 403 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Musiro. (145 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Musiro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Musiro | 2012 Ford F-350 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Ford |
| Model | Musiro | F-350 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2500 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 548 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 6269 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2029 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3967 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 132 L |
