2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1955 Renault Juva
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 525 kg more than 1955 Renault Juva.
Because 1955 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1955 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Daewoo | Renault |
| Model | Rezzo | Juva |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 745 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2360 mm |
