2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1956 Triumph 10 Break
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Triumph 10 Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Triumph 10 Break would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 510 kg more than 1956 Triumph 10 Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1956 Triumph 10 Break | |
| Make | Daewoo | Triumph |
| Model | Rezzo | 10 Break |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 948 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 760 kg |
