2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1958 Triumph TR3

To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Triumph TR3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Triumph TR3 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Triumph TR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1958 Triumph TR3. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1958 Triumph TR3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 345 kg more than 1958 Triumph TR3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1958 Triumph TR3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Triumph TR3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Daewoo Rezzo 1958 Triumph TR3
Make Daewoo Triumph
Model Rezzo TR3
Year Released 2000 1958
Body Type Minivan Roadster
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1761 cc 1991 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 94 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1270 kg 925 kg
Vehicle Length 4360 mm 3840 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1400 mm
Vehicle Height 1590 mm 1280 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2240 mm