2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1960 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (119 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. (34 HP @ 3900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 505 kg more than 1960 Volkswagen Beetle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1960 Volkswagen Beetle | |
Make | Daewoo | Volkswagen |
Model | Rezzo | Beetle |
Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 42 L |