2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1962 Maserati Tipo 64
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (12 cylinders), 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 (317 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (119 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 should accelerate faster than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 665 kg more than 1962 Maserati Tipo 64.
Because 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Maserati Tipo 64. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1962 Maserati Tipo 64 | |
Make | Daewoo | Maserati |
Model | Rezzo | Tipo 64 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2210 mm |