2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1962 Volkswagen Beetle
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volkswagen Beetle would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. (24 HP @ 3300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 510 kg more than 1962 Volkswagen Beetle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1962 Volkswagen Beetle | |
Make | Daewoo | Volkswagen |
Model | Rezzo | Beetle |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1129 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2410 mm |