2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1965 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1965 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1965 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 310 kg more than 1965 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (149 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2000 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1965 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Daewoo | Wartburg |
Model | Rezzo | 312 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.5 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.5 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2460 mm |