2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 160 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1966 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Daewoo | DKW |
| Model | Rezzo | Munga |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 978 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2010 mm |
