2000 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 1967 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1967 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1967 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 610 kg more than 1967 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Daewoo Rezzo | 1967 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Daewoo | DAF |
Model | Rezzo | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2000 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 745 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2060 mm |